I’m looking at building a 12s4p battery using 18650 cells, I was thinking mainly of using Samsung 25r cells but can someone tell me if these will be good to use instead? https://ru.nkon.nl/rechargeable/18650-size/sony-us18650vtc6.html
Yes, those should be good. Samsung 30q, Lg HG2 batteries would also work.
Awesome thanks matey, now my battery should last longer per charge, I’ll check out the Samsung 30q’s too, might use them for a third build later on
I’ve been happy with the Samsung 25R’s that I have, but I kind of wish I’d got with the 30Q (when I bought them a year ago, we hadn’t really figured out how good a cell the 30Q was)
I’d also toss in the VTC5a’s for consideration. Newer variant w/ 25A output capability - but slightly less capacity at 2600mAh.
What about the Sony VTC6?
VTC6 is a great cell too - but 20A vs 25A for the newer little brother VTC5a. 25% more amp delivery and only 400mAh penalty (2600mAh VTC5a vs 3000mAh VTC6).
I’d google some “VTC6 / 30q / VTC5a - mooch” and look for some of his discharge graphs - i opted for VTC5a for my next pack because i wanted more amp delivery available, without crazy range needed (or more weight).
VTC6/HG2 12s4p = 12000mAh capacity (50.4v * 12Ah = 604Wh = 60km/37mi!) Assuming 10Wh=1km. VTC5a = 12s4p = 10400mAh (50.4v * 10.4Ah = 524Wh = 52km/32mi)
I am going for 12s3p VTC5a = 7800mAh (50.4v * 7.8Ah = 393Wh = 39km/24mi)
And associated weights of each pack (cells alone): 30q 4p = 2.2kg / 4.85lb 30q 3p = 1.65kg / 3.6lb
HG2 4p = 2.15kg / 4.7lb HG2 3p = 1.6kg / 3.5lb
VTC6 4p = 2.25kg / 4.96lb VTC6 3p = 1.68kg / 3.7lb
VTC5a 4p = 2.3kg / 5.0lb VTC5a 3p = 1.7kg / 3.74lb
so about 1.2-1.3lb 3p lighter each vs 4p cells alone (not counting wire/nickel strip/etc.) A lb is a pretty big difference on a board and i am fine with 18-20mi range real world.
my .02 and hope helps someone if thinking/comparing.
Should 30Q cells be the standard, for high powered boards?
TLDR: Mooch says, anything above 17A per cell, the VTC5A will last longer (per charge) than a 30Q.
Here are some of the less obvious stats I think matter in this case…
- VTC5A - €2.75 | x50 - €137.5
- 30Q - €3.35 | x50 - €167
300 Cycles to 70% Capacity:
- VTC5A - 10A discharge
- 30Q - 15A discharge
- VTC5A - Standard 2.5A | Max 6A
- 30Q - Standard 1.5A | Max 4A
Can the 2500mAh VTC5A run for longer than the 3000mAh 18650’s?
The Sony VTC5A is more efficient, i.e., it has a lower internal resistance, than the 3000mAh Sony VTC6, Samsung 30Q, and LG HG2. This means it has less voltage sag when being used and takes longer to drop to a low voltage cutoff point. But does it hold its voltage up well enough to run for longer than batteries with 500mAh more capacity?
If you just compare the mAh delivered by both down to 3.2V (https://imgur.com/a/QvYU2) then it looks like the 30Q is equal to or better than the VTC5A. But for a regulated device the voltage the battery runs at is important too, not just the capacity. You want the battery to stay above the mod’s low voltage cutoff for as long as possible. The watt-hour (Wh) specification for the battery take both the voltage and capacity into account.
I compared the watt-hours delivered by the VTC5A and 30Q at 10A/30W and 20A/60W down to 3.2V (about 3.5V-3.6V when put on a charger). At 10A/30W the 30Q was the winner, lasting about 10% longer.
But at 20A/60W they both ran the same amount of time.
Why? The larger voltage sag of the 30Q shortened its running time enough that the VTC5’s greater efficiency, and smaller voltage sag, let it run for just as long.
Bottom Line: At up to about 17A/50W or so the 30Q, VTC6, and HG2 will run for longer in a regulated mod. At above 20A/60W the VTC5A is the better choice. It will run for the same amount of time or longer and will run cooler at any power level.
For an unregulated/mech mod the VTC5A is the better choice since it hits harder, i.e. runs at a higher voltage, at the discharge current levels typical for those mods.
The Sony VTC6 and LG HG2 perform about the same as the 30Q and these results will be about the same for them.
I don’t pretend to be a battery expert, but if you can get cells that drop voltage less, can charge with more amps for significantly better braking, discharge higher current, stay cooler under load, last longer (AH wise) under 17A+ loads per cell, for significantly cheaper, with a slightly less overall life expectancy, why are VTC5As not the standard? Is it because nobody buys from NKON? Honestly, if I were buying cells from US distributors i’d have chosen 30Qs… but i’d like to hear if there is any consensus on this in the community?
For me right now, this is the best choice cell in terms of price/performance. VTC6 may be even better, but at almost double the price, it doesn’t make much sense. Is it price consistency, that 30Qs tend to be priced reasonably across the board?
Erm the thread is kinda old lol
Yeah I was looking at battery threads and didn’t want to make another one, figured i’d put it in a related thread.
Good reminder for this cells and for sure a good option for smaller packs which don’t get too hot on higher discharge.
You made me thinking also because of the price but…
Price of today is €3.34 VTC5A and €3.42 for 30Q (50pcs).
I’ve been using vtc5 for years in vaping and 25r, and I can tell that I really like 25r, but the vtc5 I feel like last longer and can reach a lower value delivering the same strength than when it’s fully charge
we’re not really drawing anywhere near the max discharge rate of the cells.
below is a chart of battery current drawn on my last ride, max is less than 40a - this is on a 12s4p pack - so max current draw on this ride was less than 10a per cell.
on average, current draw is about 6a for the entire ride.
all that’s to say, we’re not maxing out the cell discharge, so accordingly to mooch:
How are you manipulating your ride data? Would be a good graph for me in include in my build thread
using @Ackmaniac’s vesc monitor, android only.
app outputs telemetry data as csv:
then i just stuck it in excel to make the graph.
i think metr does this better but…you know, it costs money.
I think the singular data set looks better, I dislike how metr makes me look at all of the data on one screen.
Maybe it doesnt work that way, I dont know. My only experience is with the web plugin.
have no experience with metr.
it’s an extra step, but once you put this data into excel, you can select whatever dataset you want displayed.
Here is the ride data from my last ride, battery amps charted from highest to lowest over the course of the ride. Basically how many data points (how long) I was at some level of amp draw… It should make sense:
I don’t draw 80 battery amps a lot, but it’s still a chunk small chunk of the ride at least. This is on a 10S4P battery. This small chunk of high amp output probably doesn’t make the (continuous) high discharge on a VTC5A span out to being able to beat a 30Q, at least on my average ride.
Either way, having an even higher amp draw capable cell will be more fun and drawing more than 20A per cell consistently probably applies the most to EMTBs or lower pressure pneumatic riders who ride hard, maybe even just urethane riders at constant stop and go under full acceleration and fat on the bones (or a backpack and hands full of groceries). This isn’t me, minus the extra fat… I do just want batteries rated to give me double that 80A battery output for kraaazy torque.
Maybe I’ve just answered why 30Q is standard. Our amp draws are generally not consistently higher than what a 30Q is capable of, and prices on VTC5A fluctuate wildly depending on your source and when you buy.
that’s an interesting way to visualize it.
also, i think the first chart i had was for a single drive, i think i need to double it since it’s dual.
even with doubling values, average current draw is 12a.
Click on the name of the data and it toggles it on or off on the metr app.
Depending on why your looking at data but I don’t see the point in looking at one part of the data with out it’s related parts.
It’s like comparing the mpg of 2 cars when ones a family car going slow down a hill and the others a race car floring it up a hill climb.