I have been on this forum for 2 years now, and in this time, I’ve seen this industry go from almost nothing to flourishing industry. Along the way, things have changed quite a bit from the old days of having to do so much yourself or pay through the roof to buy a simi-usable product that still had more issues than todays cheap products.
One thing I’ve seen as a vendor and builder, time and time again, is the desire for a good looking board. I don’t think there are many builders out there that could care less how their board looks. But the issue comes up over and over again for me. What is most important. A practical board or one that looks good?
Now I bet many are saying why can’t you have both?
The issue lies with what we are trying to do. Cram a bunch of electronics into a board with motors that feels good to ride, looks good, and also has the performance to back it all up.
If your ok with weaker performance and a 10s2p is ok for you, the problem is easier to solve. But once your start trying to cram a 12s4p and multiple vesc’s into a board, the board becomes a bit more complicated. You have to think about how you can fit all of this into a shape that still looks nice and rides nice.
The easiest solution is to look towards carbon fiber decks if looks are what you are all about. it’s easy to make sleek looking with carbon fiber and some foam as a core. The problem starts with the material itself though. Carbon fiber is not designed to flex at all.
Now you might be asking why is this not desirable when looking at the practicality aspect? The reason is because no flex means the vibrations of the road go straight to your feet. This means your feet are likely to become sore on longer rides (5+ miles) if your roads aren’t all butter.
Wood has been used as the primary material in decks for a long time. One reason is the cost aspect, but another comes from the performance aspect. Not only does the slight natural flex of wood decks help absorb vibrations but also the jolt of moderate sized cracks. The problem with a wood deck is getting it to look sleek and curvy like you can with a carbon fiber deck.
The other aspect to decks is the concave. Less concave makes it easier to build and no flex with a carbon fiber deck is even easier. However, concave is what makes a deck have a “feel” to it. It’s make makes is comfortable to ride for long periods of time and maintain a high degree of control.
So my question to the community is simple. What is most important to you? If you had to choose which one you care more about.
To to clarify, Practicality means good power, good range, comfortable to ride and has a great overall feel to the way it rides. And Looks, well… Don’t think I need to break that down any more, haha.
Practicality or Looks? Which is more important?
- Practicality
- Looks
0 voters
Personally, I am all about performance and the feel of riding. This is why I started making hollow core wooden decks. However, from the forum, I see far more interest for some reason (I’m guessing looks) in carbon fiber hollow core decks.
P.S. I am in no way trying to marginalize Carbon Fiber decks. If looks are most important to your and your not someone who rides above 20 mph or for more than a mile or two at a time, the Carbon Fiber deck is a great option. They can be a preferable option over 100% wood decks, as in this case.