LaCroix Board Co. -- wood and CF deck + segmented flex carbon fiber enclosure -- GROUP BUY [COMPLETED]

Thought I would post this here and go fishing for help from anyone willing to offer it.

As it stands I have been unsuccessful setting up the Hoyt puck remote with a stock Lacroix board.

When setting the proper pulsewidth min/max values through the BLDC tool it leaves the deadzone on the remote at a value of 40%, meaning that when the proper pulsewidth values are set i am left with 10 percent brake being applied when not touching anything on the remote.

I have tried several things to circumvent this, including using the default values for pulsewidth min and max. Doing this does give me 100% throttle and the deadzone is at 50%, but it stops at 23% for min pulsewidth or brake value.

At this point im really at a loss for how to proceed. Using the Vesc_Tool requires updating the firmware on the Lacroix and I really don’t want to loose or change anything about the way the board rides/behaves/it’s values throttle curve or any of that jazz.

I just want to safely use this hoyt puck remote so freakin badly.

Someone…anyone…please give me some advice im at a loss here.

contact Lacroix and let them know your predicament and ask them for their settings? or just update the firmware and redo it yourself with sensible values…

I thought we dealt with this? HMU. Or @JohnnyMeduse

#confused

Nah, basically Hoyt told me to reach out to you, the issue is ongoing as the only other way for me to set up the remote without touching the firmware is to allow a throttle value over 100% to give the remote the sweetspot 50% deadzone or resting rate… whatever ya’ll call it when you aren’t touching the remote.

Im not savvy enough to upgrade the firmware and mess with motor settings and all that other good stuff because i have literally no idea what any of it means and the only thing im comfortable with at this point is pairing remotes and setting the values.

I guess the resolution is updating the Lacroix boards firmware, im just not sure what all that entails and im afraid it’s going to ruin the current feel of the way the board rides.

1 Like

Let’s take this to PM. Sorry this is happening, thanks for the understanding. HMU in our thread.

I want to help as much as I can.

2 Likes

13 posts were split to a new topic: Warriors Path Challenge

Good call @mmaner

2 Likes

I thought so, thanks tho :slight_smile:

4 Likes

IMG_2089

LaSagne for Sale!!! :roll_eyes:

2 Likes

Who is that guy? He should part it out and sell me the deck and enclosure lol

1 Like

him

10 char

1 Like

He’s the guy that was mad his 10s4p wouldn’t go 50 miles.

1 Like

nah, this says San Jose. that guy is in nyc

I don’t know, but it was boostedo that had the complaint and he’s calling it LaSag.

  • To be clear, I didn’t call the LaCroix board Lesag, BOOSTEDO did. I was simply using coroberative evidence to define why I thought is was BOOSTEDO selling.
2 Likes

Might be why Laquoix is NOT bringing a board to the Barrett UP-Hill to run against Hoyt, Ollin, Enertion and possibly even a Meepo Awd may show.

Lol that’s kinda rad.

MBS 8in wheels and a 10s4p, kinda ridiculous to expect 50 miles.

I wonder how @Sender 's LaCroix would do in the uphill race? I bet pretty good.

2 Likes

They’re all the way in Canada though

10s3p single hub motor? :thinking:

It appears to be another direct drive Carvon copy.