Ah, I noted that your switch didn’t have a fuse. All good on that front, it was pretty obvious to me haha.
Care to elaborate?
1 Like
It’s pretty easy to get the OFF power conssumption in uA range.
If you share your schematic i can give you a hand
6 Likes
We can make it draw 0 when it is off but would like to pay extra for it? Everything is possible to make, but you people always complaining that it is too expensive.
We can make it so switch would make u coffee when u turn on it 
1 Like
I’m talking about a few passive components, it’s shouldn’t change the bom price.
But i can also get rekt’d
5 Likes
It is nice that you are suggesting, but you don’t know our switch design and how it works. It is not a few extra passive components.
Canadian sorry, just trying to lend a hand. What do i know
8 Likes
I dont mind you trying to lend a hand, but I would love to see how u would turn off/on power rail with few passive components 
Manners…
1 Like
your welcom
5 Likes
Yes, this is nice example if your switch is using MCU…
1 Like
An MCU can cost less than a few dollars to add to a BOM. Especially if they’re fire and forget.
1 Like
Everything is cheap if you only consider BOM price.
In device manufacturing at any quantity, it’s king.
MCUs can do a lot for very little, I have found they save time and effort again and again as they often allow for simple yet smart design choices at a minimal cost to BOM. Unless you’re talking about the firmware development, which I consider negligible with this level of complexity of device.
1 Like
guess it would be possible to have a latching circuit to get rid of the mcu, like you said, i don’t know your circuit. i’m just guessing best practice.
3 Likes
Well yes, but manpower and etc things cost money too. Some device design would cost more than BOM for 1M devices 
Everyone can buy a part but not everyone can make that part work like intended and specialist get paid to do it.
Try to explain that to any EE company by telling it is just a simple switch or any other professional engineering company that it is pretty simple.
Let’s not discuss this any further as this topic is completely not related to the issue.
We already have solution for this but at the moment to throw away whole stock is not wise so maybe in future we will update it. Right now it works like it should, and many people have no issues with it.
1 Like
By responding to this, you’re inviting discussion. Unless you’re saying you just don’t want to discuss this within this thread. Either way I’ll just say this:
So you don’t think I’m entirely talking opinion out my ass:
I lead hardware development for a device technology company for my day job. I disagree, but the MCU vs static/passive design argument is often a generational one. Personally, I wouldn’t consider running a modern ‘EE company’ without an embedded engineer on staff.
2 Likes
I am sorry my english is not really good, I am going back to works so I dont have time anymore to discuss this.
2 Likes
Totally understood! Thanks for taking the time today to discuss your design and products.
I appreciate it.
3 Likes
Wow.
Did you know that the roll to start antispark from @Martinsp also slowly drains the battery?
I bet most do.
A note stating how much it drains is all I need and then be done with it.
@Kug3lis @3DServisas your pulleys rock.
Sure peoples could be posting a bit less arrogant. Let’s admit to being guilty to that or anything else that was offensive or something else and move on.
3 Likes
I should start welding up my 35 degree risers to sell. Looks like some bridges are burning.